Details on how to sign up and speak will be posted on the City's website. http://vancouver.ca/meetingschedule 
Information on this application is available on the following link:
rezoning.vancouver.ca/applications/1619-1651ebroadway/index.htm

The order of the agenda for May 22nd has not been set yet. Other rezoning applications will also be debated including a 6-storey building proposed for 2109 East Hastings:
http://rezoning.vancouver.ca/applications/2109ehastings/index.htm

​GWAC Public Meeting Monday, 7 May 2018
Learning Resource Centre (Britannia Library)
Special Guest Speakers and Contributors: Area-Wide Rezoning 
Joseph Jones, Jeanette Jones, Jim Lehto, Elizabeth Murphy, and Steve Bohus (facilitator/media)
The meeting began at 7:06 pm
D. Cromie welcomed members of the public and special guests and reminded attendees to use the new name-tag identification system for our meetings. He also pointed out the Donations Jar sitting on the Membership Table and welcomed people to sign up to be GWAC members and to donate to support our non-profit organization.
Business Arising: No new business to report.
Correspondence Report:
D. Cromie compiled exit poll results from the proposed Mixed-Use Detox Facility Open House at 1636 Clark Drive and 1st Avenue and sent them to the Mayor and Council. We printed 100 questionnaires and received 100 responses, most with comments. Beyond the basic 49 no's and 40 yes's, the size answers are much more telling: 36% found this proposal acceptable at the proposed size or larger; a further 7% would find this proposal acceptable at 75% of the proposed size; a further 15% would find this proposal acceptable at 50% of the proposed size. Clearly, rather than saying no, the neighbours are saying this project is too big as proposed. Respondents acknowledged the need for more detox facilities in the city, but many asked that proposed project be scaled back. GWAC has long supported distribution of services rather than concentrating them in a single neighbourhood or area.
He also mentioned that GWAC has received several inquiries and requests for information from residents who are worried about the summer closure of East 1st Avenue, from Nanaimo to Clark Drive, and the already-increasing traffic volumes on their neighbourhood streets. In an effort to inform people about traffic calming, S. Briggs has put together Traffic-Calming Tool Kit, which is basically a two-page primer for novice traffic calmers. The kit will be posted to the GWAC website: www.gwac.ca.
Treasurer’s Report: No Report

​Community Announcements:
Great Grandview Neighbourhood Garage Sale: Coming to the streets across the GW catchment area on Saturday, June 16th, 10 to 2 pm. Everyone is invited to participate—just put your stuff in front of your homes and sell. 
Grandview Garden Club, Thursday, May 10th, 7 to 9 pm, Learning Resource Centre. Topic: Creative Containers. Presenter: Tammyanne Matthew, Landscape Architect.
Stone Soup Festival, Saturday, May 12th, Noon to 5 pm. Britannia Site and Napier Greenway. Website: https://www.britanniacentre.org/community/events/events_calendar/events/65.php
Mothers’ Day Traditional Pow Wow, Sunday, May 13th, 11 am to 9 pm. Britannia Gym A/B and Napier Greenway. Website: https://www.britanniacentre.org/community/events/events_calendar/events/65.php
Grandview Heritage Group, Thursday, May 17th, 7 to 9 pm. Britannia Boardroom. The group has just celebrated its seventh anniversary—congratulations. For more information on the Heritage Group, please check the website: http://grandviewheritagegroup.org/.
Grandview Garden Tour, Sunday, June 17th, 10 to 4 pm. Tickets $15 (at Figaro’s). This year, there are 12 Gardens on the tour. For more information check the website: http://eastsidegardentour.blogspot.ca/

After the announcements, S. Bohus took the floor to introduce the guests and the area-wide mass re-zoning.
Last Fall (2017), RT5 zones were re-zoned. The Grandview Woodland Community Plan introduced 4-storey Secured Rentals, but that proposal has been taken off the table (for north of East Hastings on the east side of Nanaimo). What is left is 3.5 and 4 storey zoning across the catchment, basically an area-wide mass rezoning. The City may be in the final stages of this rezoning; there were Open Houses held in January and March of 2018. The panels shown to the public in March stated that a recommendations for the 4-storey zones would be brought to City Council in the spring, which would presumably go to Public Hearing.
12th Avenue (Clark to John Hendry Park): An area-wide rezoning is available for the south side of 12th Avenue, as well as the first block east of Clark on the north side. The City recommends 4-storey apartments, with a maximum of 1.7 FSR for lot assemblies of 4 units or more (compared to 1.0FSR for a single lot or 1.2 FSR for assemblies of two or three lots). Spot rezoning is available for the part of the north side of 12th Ave; it is not included in the mass area rezoning.
The area-wide 4-storey apartment zones are also recommended for East 1st Avenue (from just east of Commercial to Semlin Drive), as well as Garden Drive (7th to 8th and 10th to 11th).
Note: Change in density with mass rezoning (lot assembly means density goes up). 
Grandview Community Plan, passing in 2016, limits/defines height to 40 feet or 3.5 storeys, with 1.3 FSR (page 91 of the Plan) from Semlin Drive to Garden Drive on 1st Ave.
Townhouse/Row houses are approved for arterial streets. For example, at 1st and Templeton, townhouses or row houses can now be built on four or more assembled lots. Clearly, the City is incentivizing lot assembly. At Charles and Kitchener between Nanaimo and Kamloops, zoning is proposed for townhouses or row houses on the middle of the block. A number of blocks on Nanaimo from East Pender all the way down to East 12th Avenue (outside of the shopping nodes) are proposed to be in a 3.5-storey row house/townhouse zone, with a choice of use at grade that will allow choice for between residential and commercial. The 3.5-storey zone will allow 4-storey apartment forms with assemblies of 4 or more lots.
Nanaimo at Venables is seeing a surge in lot assembly, as are a number of other sections of the arterials currently under planning.

Find out more about the City of Vancouver's proposed upzoning of a number of arterial streets and adjacent side streets in the Grandview planning area.

Date: Monday, May 7th, 7pm - 9pm
Location: Learning Resource Centre, (LRC), Under the Britannia Library, 1661 Napier Street

The proposed zoning changes to create new 4-storey zones may go to Public Hearing at Vancouver City Council later in the spring or during the summer.

A presentation and analysis of the City's proposed new 4-storey zones will be followed by open discussion, questions and answers. Additional guests will include Elizabeth Murphy and a former City of Vancouver planner. Joseph and Jeanette Jones will speak about the experience in the Norquay area in East Vancouver (around Kingsway and Nanaimo) following the City's upzoning and creation of new zones in 2013 and 2016 in that neighbourhood (further documented on the Eye on Norquay blog).

The City of Vancouver's materials from the March 14th and 17th Open Houses can be found online at vancouver.ca/gw. The area-wide zoning changes would allow for townhouses/rowhouses, 4-storey apartments and 4-storey mixed residential/commercial on parcels of land that are currently zoned for duplex and multiple family dwellings. Certain zones would encourage lot assembly by allowing for additional increases in density. The information panels from the City's last Open House and the proposed changes are listed in the following links:

• View overview map of proposed zoning changes  (448 KB)
• View the open house information displays  (10.4 MB)

Two policy reports for rezoning proposals in Grandview-Woodland have appeared on the Vancouver City Council regular meeting set for May 1, 2018. http://council.vancouver.ca/20180501/regu20180501ag.htm

These are the items:
2. CD-1 Rezoning: 2109 East Hastings Street

• Report

3. CD-1 Rezoning: 1619-1651 East Broadway

• Report

http://rezoning.vancouver.ca/applications/1619-1651ebroadway/index.htm
http://rezoning.vancouver.ca/applications/2109ehastings/index.htm

If these rezoning reports are referred, then it's possible that the items will be heard on the May 22nd Public Hearing, or perhaps on May 15th or June 5th (the agendas for the upcoming Public Hearings have not been announced yet). Members of the public can sign up and speak to City Council on these items and also send in correspondence.

​Update
The Panels from the open house have been posted on the BC Housing website.
www.bchousing.org/partner-services/public-engagement/projects/vancouver-1st-clark

If you would like to leave comments, questions, or concerns about the Withdrawal Centre proposed for 1st Avenue and Clark Drive, you may do so at  communityrelations@bchousing.org  or at  www.bchousing.org

Open House
The City of Vancouver, BC Housing and Vancouver Coastal Health are looking to put a large withdrawal management services facility at 1636 Clark Drive and 1321-1395 East 1st Avenue, on half of a City block.

An Open House is being held for feedback about the proposed rezoning at the following time and date:

Date: April, 23, 2018 (Monday) from 5pm to 7:30pm
Location: Vancouver Community College (VCC) 1155 East Broadway, Vancouver, Building B (off 7th Ave), RM 1236

A press release notes that a "withdrawal management centre within the planned complex will replace Vancouver Coastal Health’s current withdrawal management services facility on East 2nd Ave. It will include a range of enhanced services such as inpatient and outpatient withdrawal management, and sobering and at-home withdrawal management, which are trauma-informed and culturally appropriate."

Further information about the Open House and proposed rezoning can be found in the following documents:
www.bchousing.org/publications/1st-Clark-Open-House-Invitation.pdf
http://www.vch.ca/about-us/news/news-releases/new-homes-and-withdrawal-centre-for-people-in-vancouver

The following illustration is reproduced from the Open House invitation:

The City of Vancouver is organizing an Open House regarding a rezoning application at 1680 Adanac Street (at Commercial). The rezoning is for a 6-storey market rental building with a height of 73.7ft (22.5m), 38 units, 25 parking spots, and a floor space ratio of 3.0.

Date: April 19, 2018 (Thursday), 5-7pm
Location: 1607 East Hastings Street (Vancouver Aboriginal Friendship Centre)

The rezoning application is online: rezoning.vancouver.ca/applications/825commercial/index.htm
The site is currently zoned as RM-4N: bylaws.vancouver.ca/zoning/rm-4&4n.pdf

A draft Master Plan proposed for the renewal of the Britannia Community Centre site will be shown at an upcoming Open House.

Date: ​Saturday, April 14, 2018 from 12 to 4pm
Location: Britannia Gym D, 1661 Napier Street 

Further details will also be on the City of Vancouver website: vancouver.ca/britannia-renewal

The City of Vancouver is organizing a public Open House for a rezoning application on a lot assembly at East 10th Avenue and Garden Drive. The proposal calls for the construction of a 66' (20.1m) tall, 6-storey building with 68 strata units and 73 parking units, with a floor space ratio of 2.65.

The Open House will be held on Thursday, April 12, 2018 between 5pm and 7pm at 3250 Commercial Drive (Croatian Cultural Centre). The site of the lot assembly is located in the Grandview Woodland plan area. Additional information about the rezoning application can be found on the City of Vancouver website.
(link: rezoning.vancouver.ca/applications/2542garden/index.htm  address: 2542-2570 Garden Drive &
2309-2369 East 10th Avenue ).

Due to Easter Monday falling on April 2nd, the monthly meeting of GWAC will take place a week later.

Next meeting: April 9th, 7pm at the Britannia Learning Resource Centre

Meet the new board, hear from the local traffic committee, hear about the Britannia update from Cynthia Low, and join the discussion.

​The City of Vancouver's planning department will be hosting two Open Houses on proposed changes in zoning for townhouses, rowhouses and apartments. The changes are proposed for sections of East 12th Avenue, 10th, 8th, 1st, East Hastings, Garden and Nanaimo Street.

These Open Houses will be held at the following times:

Wednesday, March 14, 5:30 – 8:30 pm
Lord Nelson Elementary School Gym, 2235 Kitchener

Saturday, March 17, 12 noon – 3 pm
WISE Hall, 1882 Adanac (at Victoria)

The City has not released the materials for these events yet online, however, the panels from the event will likely be posted after March 15th (on www.vancouver.ca/grandviewplan ). As the City is planning a new 4-storey zone, will staff release the drafts of the actual text of the proposed changes for review and public scrutiny? Are design guidelines planned so that the proposed new zones fit in with the existing character of Grandview-Woodland? Will residents have a chance to have a meaningful review of the proposed text of the new zoning prior to it going to City Council for a vote?

The Grandview Woodland Area Council thinks these Open House meetings and the decisions that will result are very important to the neighbourhood and we recommend residents attend the meetings, examine the information provided and ask the planners questions.  As an example, here are 9 questions we think the neighbourhood should have answers to:

​1. What will be the maximum density for the assembled sites, in terms of both FSR and unit density? 
Density is measured in two ways: Floor Space Ratio (FSR) and Unit Density. FSR is a ratio that compares the useable floor space in a building to the area of the site. An FSR of 1.0 would apply to a single-storey building that completely covers the site, or a 2-storey building that covers half the site, or a 4-storey building that covers one quarter of the site, etc. Unit density is the number of dwelling units that can be built on 1 hectare of land. ( Eg.In Norquay stacked townhouses and traditional rowhouses are allowed a maximum FSR of 1.2 and a maximum unit density of 132 per hectare. Norquay does not have courtyard rowhouses, but in Marpole courtyard rowhouses are allowed the same FSR and unit density. In both Norquay and Marpole. 4-storey apartments are allowed a maximum FSR of 2.0 and a maximum unit density of 240 per hectare. Maximum density is for assembled sites.?
 
2. How will you encourage the construction of traditional row-houses as opposed to stacked townhouses in this zone? 
eg. In Norquay’s RM-7 Rowhouse/Stacked Townhouse zone, we have so far seen 23 applications for stacked townhouses and only 3 for rowhouses. Most developers will favour the building form that produces the largest number of units.
3. What provisions are there for lock-off units?
A lock-off unit is a portion of the main dwelling unit that can be locked off to be used separately or to be rented out. It is not counted as a separate dwelling unit. 
In Norquay, each traditional rowhouse unit is allowed to include 1 lock-off unit. Stacked townhouse developments are allowed 2 lock-off units for every 3 stacked townhouse units. Dwellings in 4-storey apartment buildings are allowed 1 lock-off unit for every 3 principal units, with a possible increase of the ratio at the discretion of planning staff.
 
4. What provisions are there for parking?
Traditional row-houses in Norquay have ground-level parking spaces behind the building, 1 space per unit. Four-storey apartments have underground parking, 1 space per unit. Lock-off units do not require on-site parking spaces. Courtyard row-house developments on the east side of Vancouver (e.g. in Kensington-Cedar Cottage) usually provide parking in individual garages attached to the rear of the unit. This arrangement results in most of the open space on the site (the “courtyard”) being taken up by driveways to access the garages.
 
5.  How will you ensure that a minimum liveable width is maintained for new units, in order to ensure that designs can maximize usable floor space? 
Traditional rowhouses in Norquay have a minimum interior width of 12 ft. This results in long, narrow units, especially on deeper lots. These units have fewer windows and they need to allocate considerable space to interior walkways between the front and back of the unit.
 
6. How will you ensure a minimum liveable size is maintained for living rooms and bedrooms in new developments? 
Norquay has seen bedrooms as small as 7 ft. x 8 ft. Living rooms in one 2000 sq. ft. traditional row-house project can comfortably seat only 4 people. The City of Vancouver currently has no guidelines for room sizes, although staff have said that they are working on them.
 
7. What initiatives will the City and Parks Board undertake to guarantee additional public green spaces and other amenities, including new recreational facilities and programs, new parks, early childhood education programs, and off-leash dog parks, to serve this increased density?  
With new development, more and more people and their pets will continue to be crammed into increasingly developed urban spaces, often with significantly smaller living spaces. Additional as opposed to just improved urban green spaces and recreational and educational facilities are essential for people to connect with their communities, their neighbours, and the diminishing amounts of nature in our city, and for their mental health. 

8. Will irrigation systems be installed for plantings where ground level open space is semi-private or shared?
 In new developments, where open space is shared, ornamental plantings and new lawns are often not being watered unless an irrigation system is installed.  In our view, in order to maximize the benefits of green spaces and vegetation, irrigation systems should be required for all new development. ​

9.  Given possible increased costs as a result of increased public amenities, how will the City guarantee the affordability of the proposed units under consideration? 
Public amenity requirements add to the cost of an apartment or townhouse in Vancouver and these costs can be passed on to buyers, especially when developers are forced to comply with city by-laws that limit building heights and thus their profits. 

The population of Grandview-Woodland grew by 6.85% from 2011 to 2016, faster than the City of Vancouver growth rate of 4.64%. That's 68% faster than the City's average rate of population growth.

GWAC will be holding an Annual General Meeting
Sunday, March 11, 2018 @  2 pm

Canucks Family Education Centre
1655 William Street, Britannia CC
above Family Place, bordering Grandview Park

Guest Speaker: The Hon. Shane Simpson,
Minister of Social Development & Poverty Reduction
 MLA Vancouver-Hastings 

Note: The meeting will start with the guest speaker at 2pm, followed by the AGM.

Agenda:
  Approval of Minutes from 2017 AGM
    President’s Report
   Financial Report
Membership Report
       Election of Directors for 2018-19

What to do When a Proposed Project Raises Local Concern? 

In a neighbourhood of 1 1/2 to 2 storey houses, a group of neighbours find themselves being presented with a proposed 6 storey building immediately adjacent, as their newest neighbour, which has raised grave concerns. 

The primary reservation(s)  generally fall into the category of ‘lack of fit’.  There is no dispute that increased density in the Grandview Woodland community is necessary and inevitable (as with all downtown adjacent neighbourhoods) and could in fact add to the quality of our community, it is believed this goal can  be achieved without sacrificing the very qualities which define Grandview Woodland.

Come to hear  the analysis and review conducted  by local residents and their comprehensive and thoughtful submissions to City Planners.

7:00pm Monday, February 5, 2018
Learning Resource Centre, (LRC)
Under the Britannia Library

The City of Vancouver is seeking input on proposed zoning changes for Rowhouse, Townhouse and 4-storey Apartment areas in Grandview-Woodland.
Comments can be made to the Planning Department until February 18, 2018 via email or in person at open houses at the Wise Hall (1882 Adanac Street) on January 27 (12 – 3pm) and January 31 (5 – 8pm). Details on the CIty's proposed zones are online at the following webpage:
​
http://vancouver.ca/home-property-development/grandview-woodland-community-plan.aspx

Malcolm Bromley, General Manager 
Vancouver Board of Parks and Recreation
cc: Vancouver Park Board 
cc: Save Templeton Park Pool

Dear Mr. Bromley

 Re: Templeton Pool

As Chair of Grandview Woodland Area Council, and on behalf of Grandview Woodland residents, the Council urges you to consider taking steps to save Templeton Park Pool. This is a valuable neighbourhood resource that cannot be replaced with a community pool in the new Britannia Community Services Centre redevelopment. For current Templeton users, switching to Britannia means crossing two additional busy streets, probably in a car, which requires parking; it means a busier pool with less available time for special senior, disabled and youth programs.

Given anticipated density increases along both Nanaimo and Hastings Streets, future needs for a local swimming pool will increase. Driving to a busier pool in the next neighbourhood will probably mean many patrons, current and future, will forgo this healthy activity.
 
Sincerely,
Dana Cromie, Chair 
Grandview Woodland Area Council

Letters to Park Board in support of keeping Templeton Pool Open were written by MLA Shane Simpson, MP Jenny Kwan, and the Hastings Community Association. These letters are reproduced here for reference.
Further information about the "VanSplash" report that may result in the closure of community pools such as Templeton can be found on the City of Vancouver's website.
vancouver.ca/parks-recreation-culture/vansplash-aquatics-strategy.aspx

November 30, 2017
 
Dear Vancouver Park Board Commissioners,
 
I am writing this to you on behalf of Hastings Community Association and in the interests of the entire Hastings Sunrise community regarding the Vansplash proposal to decommission Templeton pool.
 
The Vansplash survey was flawed and did not capture the picture of what this segment of our community truly wants or needs. For one thing, many seniors and children have limited access to the technology to complete the survey. Those who did complete the survey found it quite leading as it did not directly get at the issue of the importance of having a local community pool. It seemed that the questions were phrased in a manner that would get the desired results for Vansplash. Consequently, as a community, we feel strongly that our concerns have not been heard. It feels as though staff and consultants do not fully understand the negative impact on our community the closing of Templeton pool would have.

The next public GWAC meeting will be held at 7:00pm Monday, January 8, 2018
Location: Learning Resource Centre, (LRC) Under the Britannia Library

Agenda
REACH Clinic has reopened at last - with a bright & shiny new facility. Come hear Colleen Fuller brief us  on their services and new facility!

Templeton Pool Update
Templeton Pool may have recently received a reprieve yet its future remains uncertain.  Come hear how local volunteers saved the pool and what might need to be done to protect its future for the community. Park Board may decide the fate of the pool on January 29th, 2018.

There will be no GWAC meeting in December of 2017. The next GWAC meeting will be held on Monday, January 8th, 2018. Further details will be announced prior to the meeting.

Hear from the candidates running for Vancouver City Council on Monday, October 2nd, 2017 at 7pm. The meeting will take place at the Britannia High School Auditorium near Commercial Drive and Napier Street (1001 Cotton Drive).

Do you have any questions for the candidates? Please send these in advance of the meeting to info@gwac.ca. There will also be an opportunity to ask questions from the floor. Election day is on Saturday, October 14th.

Transportation: The location is accessible via transit (bus #20). Parking is available on the north side of Britannia High School (approach lot from Venables Street via Cotton or Woodland Drive).

The City of Vancouver has proposed changes to the RT5 and RT6 zones under a report to council dated July 25, 2017, that is referred to public hearing for approval. These changes have had little community input, only a few open houses, and most people in the community have not been adequately informed or involved by the city. Read the report published July 13, 2017 here.
 
The Grandview Woodland Area Council (GWAC) is requesting a more extensive consultation process through a community advisory committee and that specific issues be addressed before this report is approved. Read GWAC's letter to Mayor & Council.
 
Sign the Petition Here:  http://chn.ge/2wmeXk8
 
We, the undersigned, believe the RT5 and RT6 proposed zoning amendments are not ready for approval by City Council and request more time to make changes to address the many outstanding issues as identified by the Grandview Woodland Area Council (GWAC).
 
________________________________________
 
The PUBLIC HEARING is Thursday, September 21st (reconvening from TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 19, 2017)
Register to speak !! Further details are on the City's webpage: 
 council.vancouver.ca/20170919/phea20170919ag.htm

 Let your voice be heard; these proposals have the potential to change our neighbourhood in irreversible ways!

Please see the letter below stating our opposition to the proposed amendments going to Public Hearing on September 19th & 21st, 2017, detailing the concerns of the Grandview Woodland Area Council.

​September 13, 2017
Dear Mayor Robertson and Councillors,
Re: Update - RT5 / RT6 Zones - Proposed amendments to the Zoning and Development By-law for Mount Pleasant and Grandview-Woodland Communities

Members of the Grandview Woodland Area Council (GWAC) attended the city's information session last night. It is clear that the zoning is still being drafted and likely will be amended again prior to the public hearing agenda being posted on the website later this week. Some of this is positive and some more troubling. But one thing is certain, the timeline is too short for the community to be adequately informed or to respond. We continue to call for changes to the zoning to address our concerns and more time to work with staff to achieve this.
GWAC has the following comments and concerns, in addition to our input submitted September 6, 2017 attached below.

Zoning Schedules:
1. It is good news that the size of maximum lot frontage has been reduced down from 100 ft. to 50 ft. for assembly, that means the most that can be assembled is two 25 ft. lots together. This is an improvement, but there shouldn't be any assembly at all. Breaking up a street pattern of 25 ft. frontages by introducing a huge multifamily on an assembled 50 ft. lot destroys the historic streetscape and rhythm.
In RT7/RT8 schedules it says: "The maximum frontage for a site for a multiple dwelling shall be the existing frontage of a single lot which was on record in the Land Title Office for Vancouver prior to ..." This is what RT5/RT6 should say based on this current enactment date, in order to prevent assemblies or subdivisions, to reduce inflationary speculation, and to protect the streetscape character.
2. Staff clarified the new construction options on their presentation charts, and added a few more options as well. They now propose a multiple dwelling of 3 units plus a single family house at the rear on a 50 ft. lot. This is more than they show on the retention side, although in the fine print it says that more units can be in MCDs on larger lots without specifying.
This new chart, which shows 5 options for new development on the presentation boards and 6 options in the proposed design guidelines, confirm our concerns that there are way more options favouring new construction than for retention options. The new second house on one lot option undermines the infill option for retention, both on small lots and on large lots where character houses could likely be considered underutilized.
Current proposals allow new construction to have a duplex with one secondary suite each, four in total on a standard 33 ft. lot. MCDs for character retention should at least have a similar option for a duplex with a secondary suite each unit as well.
3. It appears that the definition for "underutilized" lot to allow demolition of a character house without penalty has not changed from proposed. Underutilized should especially not apply to heritage listed properties at all.
4. The intent of the zoning has been changed to emphasize retention and renovation of existing character homes. This is a move in the right direction.
5. Front yard changes are still as proposed, with no relationship to the two adjacent properties through averaging as is in the current zoning. This should be restored.
6. FSR has been changed in RT6 to have a low outright of 0.60 FSR for new construction on non-character lots, with conditional increases in FSR. This is restored from the original RT6. However, this has not been done for RT5, which they should to ensure any increases to FSR are an appropriate fit and design for the neighbourhood.

Design Guidelines:
7. Staff have added three diagrams for clarity, much less than the original guidelines, but more than the previous draft referred to public hearing; one on how additions should be setback from the original facade, the other two regarding roof pitches and dormers for infill. There still remains to be not near enough clarity in the draft design guidelines , so the original current design guidelines should be instead retained and expanded rather than being reduced overall.
8. There are more guidelines on basic construction as outlined in the schedules. But there continues to be no guidelines regarding finishes and style of any new construction with regard to fit within a compatible character style to suit the streetscape. Even additions and renovations to character houses do not need to match the original house. Only in RT6 do the architectural components of MCDs need to match historic character guidelines. But even in RT6, these guidelines no longer apply to new construction. The original current design guidelines regarding neighbourhood character and architectural components should apply to retention and new- build options in both RT5 and RT6. Both are heritage areas that should be respected.

Conclusion:
Other than these items above, all of the previous GWAC comments attached still apply, especially regarding process. Giving the public less than a week to respond to a final revised draft bylaw, after a short and inadequate consultation process that has had no public input on many of the important details, is entirely unacceptable.
This is no way to plan about half of Grandview and a huge amount of Mt. Pleasant with further city-wide implications in all RS zones. So we continue our call for the public hearing to be postponed until there is substantial changes to the draft as requested by the community.
As the City of Vancouver strives to fulfill its Greenest City and affordability policies, avoiding demolitions through the retention and adaptive reuse of existing character buildings is essential to meet these goals. The RT5/RT6 zoning changes should be amended to ensure that the zoning is better balanced to achieve this.

Respectfully,
Dana Cromie , Chair, Grandview Woodland Area Council

Attachment

September 6, 2017
Dear Mayor Robertson and Councillors,
Re: RT5 / RT6 Zones - Proposed amendments to the Zoning and Development By-law for Mount Pleasant and Grandview-Woodland Communities
​
The Grandview Woodland Area Council (GWAC) has many concerns about the proposed changes to zoning that will cover about half of our neighbourhood. Many changes are not consistent with the city's stated goals of character retention, and the public process has not adequately involved the community in many of the important details. This current proposal is not ready for enactment so we oppose it in its current form.

The City of Vancouver will be showing the public their proposed changes to the zoning that cover over half of Grandview-Woodland at an Open House on Tuesday, September 12th. This event will be held at the Croatian Cultural Centre between 5pm and 8pm (3250 Commercial Drive – Rooms B and C). The City has also scheduled a Public Hearing on this matter for September 19th (details further below).

GWAC outlined many of the shortcomings and issues with the City's proposed zoning changes in the following letter to Council: http://www.gwac.ca/news/gwac-letter-to-council-on-proposed-rt5-rt6-zone-amendments


Reproduced below is a portion of the City's notification letter:
This notice contains information about the upcoming public hearing on amendments to the Zoning and Development Bylaw (September 19), as well as two engagement events (September 12 and 14) where you can learn more about the proposed changes. 
Both concern changes to RS and RT zoning in portions of Grandview-Woodland that would increase opportunities for housing choice and improve incentives for the retention of character homes.

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGTuesday, September 19, 2017, at 6 pm
City Hall, 453 West 12th Avenue
Third Floor, Council Chamber
Increasing Housing Choice and Character Retention Incentives in the Mount Pleasant and Grandview-Woodland Communities – Proposed Amendments to the Zoning and Development By-law
To amend the Zoning and Development By-law to increase opportunities for housing choice and provide additional incentives for the retention of character houses. If approved, the proposed changes would amend the RT-5, RT-5A, RT-5N and RT-5AN Districts Schedule; rezone certain areas from RT-4, RT-4N, RT-5A, RT-5AN, RS-1, RS-4 and RS-7, all to RT-5/5N; and amend the RT-6 District Schedule.
For more information on this application:

• Grandview-Woodland Community Plan Webpage
• Mt. Pleasant RT Zone Review Webpage

Anyone who considers themselves affected by the proposed by-law amendments may speak at the Public Hearing. Please register individually before 5 pm, September 19, 2017, by emailing publichearing@vancouver.ca or by calling 604-829-4238. You may also register in person at the door between 5:30 and 6 pm on the day of the Public Hearing.
You may submit your comments by email to publichearing@vancouver.ca, or by mail to: City of Vancouver, City Clerk's Office, 453 West 12th Avenue, 3rd Floor, Vancouver, BC, V5Y 1V4. All submitted comments will be distributed to Council and posted on the City's website. Please visit vancouver.ca/publichearings for important details.
Copies of the draft by-laws will be available for viewing starting September 8, 2017 at the City Clerk's Department in City Hall, 453 West 12th Avenue, 3rd Floor, Monday to Friday from 8:30 am to 4:30 pm. All meetings of Council are webcast live at vancouver.ca/councilvideo, and minutes of Public Hearings are available at vancouver.ca/councilmeetings. (Minutes are posted approximately two business days after a meeting.)
For more information on public hearings, including registering to speak:
vancouver.ca/publichearings.

ADDITIONAL ENGAGEMENT EVENTSIn advance of the public hearing on amendments to the Zoning and Development Bylaw, there are two opportunities for residents of Mount Pleasant and Grandview-Woodland to learn more about these proposed zoning changes and ask general or site-specific questions:
Tuesday, September 12, 2017 - Come to an information meeting on the proposed new regulations and guidelines. City staff will be on hand to answer general questions on the proposed amendments to the Zoning and Development Bylaw. The event will be an open format, with residents welcome to attend between 5 and 8 pm.

• Time and location: Croatian Cultural Centre (3250 Commercial Drive – Rooms B and C). 5:00pm to 8:00 pm.

Thursday, September 14, 2017 – We are hosting a site-specific enquiry night. It’s a good opportunity for property owners or authorized representatives to speak with City staff on a one-on-one basis about a specific property. If you would like to attend, you need to call and book an appointment ahead of time. To request an appointment, please email sam.cameron@vancouver.ca or call 604-829-9266.

• Time and location: 515 W 10th Avenue – City of Vancouver Development and Building Services Centre. 5:00pm to 8:00pm

September 6, 2017
Dear Mayor Robertson and Councillors,

Re: RT5 / RT6 Zones - Proposed amendments to the Zoning and Development By-law for
        Mount Pleasant and Grandview-Woodland Communities

The Grandview Woodland Area Council (GWAC) has many concerns about the proposed changes to zoning that will cover about half of our neighbourhood. Many changes are not consistent with the city's stated goals of character retention, and the public process has not adequately involved the community in many of the important details. This current proposal is not ready for enactment so we oppose it in its current form.
In previous rezoning processes, such as when Kitsilano was rezoned from RT4/RT5 to RT7/RT8, the city had a community advisory committee made up of local residents that worked with the planners on all aspects of the their new zoning.

GWAC requested a similar process when we met with the Manager of Planning and staff earlier in the year. Unfortunately there instead were only a few open houses that did not adequately allow for the needed community input to address our concerns or to explore options.

Grandview is a heritage area that is generally intact with the original buildings still existing.  Most of these character houses have been converted to multiple rental units, some legal and some not. These units are important sources of affordable rentals, especially when we are in a housing crisis.

Retention of existing rentals is dependent on the fate of our character houses. Growing through incremental increases of units of conversions and infill as incentives for character house retention is the sustainable way to create more affordable housing options while not losing what we have and without inflating land values. The current proposal allows too many options for new development that undermines this, including lot assembly.

The new RT5 zone should be given the same neighbourhood character consideration for contextual design and guidelines as the RT6 in west Mt. Pleasant.  We strongly disagree with the proposal to delete  these guidelines for RT5.
We agree with the city's stated intention to allow densification through incentives to retain character houses. However we do not think this proposal is ready for approval yet and request an extended timeframe to meet with staff and to have the zoning proposal further amended to address the many outstanding issues with this proposed RT5 zoning. A 31% loss of character pre-1940 houses for RT5 is way too much.

Please see the attachment below for more details of some of the many outstanding issues.

Respectfully,
Dana Cromie , Chair, Grandview Woodland Area Council

​Attachment to letter from Grandview Woodland Area Council (GWAC) dated September 6, 2017
 
GWAC concerns about the proposed RT5 zoning changes
 
1. Character criteria and "underutilized" sites:
Based on the city's figures, 31% of pre-1940 houses could be demolished. This is way too much.
Grandview was generally built out prior to 1940 and most of the original houses still exist. The character criteria proposed is too onerous if the city expects that only 80% will likely qualify as character houses. Further, by increasing the definition of "underutilized" sites from 0.30 FSR to 0.45 FSR, the city expects another 14% of those considered character will not qualify based on size. So that means only 69% of the existing pre-1940 houses will qualify for character house retention incentives and that 31% will potentially be demolished. That would be a tremendous loss to the character of our neighbourhood and to affordable rental suites.
Most of these pre-1940s houses could be restored and upgraded with multiple units as a sustainable means to accommodating growth. Even small houses are ideal for bigger infill options or additions and should be retained.

• The character house criteria should be revised to ensure most pre-1940 houses qualify as character houses to be retained with incentives.
• The definition of underutilized lots should be left at the current 0.30 FSR, especially for lots with 50 ft. frontage and greater. And "underutilized" site designations should not apply at all to heritage listed properties on the register. They can always be densified through retention infill options.

 
2. Economics:
We are concerned that there are more development options proposed for demolition and new construction than for character house retention incentives. This may have the unintended consequence of loss of older more affordable rentals in character houses, while increasing inflationary speculation.
It is proposed that a new duplex can have two secondary suites, a total of four units. While a character house can only have three units in a multifamily conversion dwelling (MCD) that requires full code upgrades of the original house. There is not even a retention option to have two secondary rental suites, with a main floor unit, that the Secondary Suite Program could make more affordable and feasible to do through code relaxations.

• Allowing four units for new construction on a small lot is too much.  Use dwelling unit density at 74 units per ha. for MCDs and infill for character retention and 64 units per ha. for new construction as per typical RT zones such as current RT6 and RT8.
• Character houses should be allowed to have more suites under the Secondary Suite Program.
• If a character merit house is demolished for a new house,  they should not be able to build a laneway house too.
• A new house can also have another small house on the same lot which undermines the retention incentives for infill, so this should not be allowed for new construction.

 
3. Site assembly for multifamily development:
Site assembly for new multifamily development will lead to speculative inflation and should be avoided.
In other character retention zones like RT8, no site assembly is allowed. However, this proposal allows up to two lots assembled for 50 ft. to 100 ft. frontage sites for multifamily. And the amount of new development is increased from 62 units per hectare to 74 units per hectare. Previously the 74 units per hectare was reserved only for character retention options and this should be reversed as per section on economics above.
Grandview already has many areas zoned for new apartment and townhouse development. The RT5 zone should be used primarily for character house retention conversions and infill, not new large site assemblies for multifamily development and demolition that lead to speculative land inflation.

• No assembly should be allowed in RT5. Under 4.2 Frontage, the maximum and minimum lot frontage should be the single lot frontage existing at the time of enactment of this zoning change.

 
4. Design guidelines:
Grandview is a heritage area since most of the original housing stock still exists. Exterior house and streetscape design are very important and need design guidelines to ensure contextually sympathetic implementation. We agree with the design guidelines being retained in RT6 west Mt. Pleasant, but disagree with guidelines being dropped for the new RT5 in east Mt. Pleasant and Grandview. The existing design guidelines have served us generally well and should be retained for now. A review for improvements, or for adding options for modernist design where appropriate, should involve detailed community input in a much more fulsome future process.

• Keep existing design guidelines for both RT6 and RT5.

 
5. Front yards:
Front yard setbacks should remain flexible and contextual as per current regulations and guidelines rather than changing to a rigid setback. Director of Planning has discretion to vary setbacks when required. Proposed changes specifies the front yard setback regardless of context.

• Retain current setbacks that are 20% of lot depth or the average of the two adjacent properties, with further guidance on how this should be applied in design guidelines. Specific cases can be varied.

 
6. Parking relaxations:
Parking relaxations should be made for character retention initiatives, but not for new construction. There is only so much street parking and relaxation priority should only be given to character retention as an incentive.

7. New RT5 zoning boundaries:
We are concerned about the locations of some of the new RT5 zoning boundaries. We would like to go over a detailed review with staff to clarify the rationale that was not part of the consultation process to date.

8. Building code relaxations and streamlined permits for character house retention:
Currently, the city makes it very difficult to renovate character houses. Incentives should include more building code relaxations and streamlined dedicated permit approvals for character house renovation and infill. 

The City of Vancouver is proposing changes to the zoning that covers a large portion of Grandview-Woodland. Find out more about the proposed heritage (RT-5) area wide rezoning at GWAC's monthly meeting.

TIme: Tuesday, September 5th, at 7pm
Location: Britannia Community Centre (Learning Resource Centre / below library)
Guest speaker: Elizabeth Murphy

Details about the proposed changes to the zoning can be found in the City of Vancouver's staff report: http://council.vancouver.ca/20170725/documents/p3.pdf

The following diagram shows the areas that would be impacted: